Worker withdraws personal injuries claim after forgetting alleged accident date

Four Courts at Night

28 October 2022

A general operative who cleaned home delivery trays supplied to supermarkets has withdrawn an action over an alleged accident on a warehouse floor after the High Court heard he could not remember exactly when it happened.

Zoubir Guelmi (49), a native of Algeria, with an address at Dufferin Avenue, South Circular Road, Dublin, claimed a stack of the trays fell on him when an adjoining stack was hit by a forklift truck.

He claimed he suffered back injuries as a result of the accident at the premises of XPO Supply Chain Ireland Ltd (formerly Norbert Dentressangle Logistics) in Woodford Business Park, Santry, Dublin, on May 30th, 2015.

XPO denied the accident occurred.

Mr Guelmi’s job with XPO was to clean trays mainly supplied to Tesco for home and other deliveries. He said that towards the end of his night shift on May 30th, 2015, a pallet of up to 20 cleaned trays was hit by the forklift and an adjoining stack of trays fell on him.

Forklift driver

He claimed the forklift driver said sorry to him and, after helping to take the trays off him, told him not to report the accident.

However, he said, about 20 minutes later he reported it to the manager and a supervisor, and he told them to check the CCTV before he went home. He was not due back at work for four days but when he returned he had to stop working because of the pain in his back, he said. He never went back to the job and returned to live in Algeria.

He told his counsel, Gabriel Gavigan SC, that the forklift should not have been in the area where there was a worker and that the vehicle was being driven too fast.

Under cross-examination by Finbarr Fox SC, for the defendant, Mr Guelmi said he could not remember the exact date it happened even though he agreed that for the last seven years he had told doctors, engineers and his lawyers that it happened on May 30th, which was a Saturday.

Work absences

When counsel put to him that nothing happened on that date and he never reported it because the two managers did not work on Saturday, he said he could not remember the exact date but he knew that the accident did happen and he reported it.

He agreed he had told the defendant’s doctor that he never had back pain before the accident. When counsel put it to him that he had recorded absences from work in 2013 and 2014 due to back pain, he said “that is possible”.

He also said he could not remember whether he told his GP about the accident three days after it when he attended with a respiratory problem. Mr Fox said there was no record of him telling the doctor about it on that date.

Following the completion of cross-examination, Mr Gavigan asked for some time to take instructions from Mr Guelmi.

When the court resumed, Mr Justice Garret Simons was told the case was being withdrawn. The judge struck out the case without making any legal costs orders and each side pays its own costs.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Judges should avoid ‘parental alienation’ term, report suggests

Parental alienation is a “highly controversial” concept and the use of the term in Irish legal settings should be treated with serious caution, researchers have said. Though the term is being used increasingly often by Irish judges, they “do not appear to use an...

Runaway jury

The proposed abolition of the legal right to trial by jury in High Court defamation proceedings strikes not just at an ancient legal right, but also at the concept of the participation of the public in the administration of justice, argues Mr Justice Bernard Barton.

Opinion: “No Collision, No Claim” The wrong decision?

Did the judge get it wrong in the recent case of a woman whose personal injury claim was dismissed due to lack of a collision? In my humble opinion, I would venture to say yes. The plaintiff in question alleged that she sustained injuries when she was compelled to...

Recent Articles

Solicitor’s Fees in Ireland

Understanding the various ways solicitors charge their clients in claims cases in Ireland, including hourly rates, fixed fees, and conditional fees (with restrictions), is important for those seeking legal representation, and utilising the Irish Claims Authority is an alternative to consider.

Alternatives to litigation in Ireland

Overview of alternatives to litigation Reference to arbitration is commonplace in commercial contracts. However, there is an increasing trend towards consent-based forms of ADR such as mediation and expert determination as more flexible and cost-efficient ADR...

Private Investigator use in Ireland

Private investigators are individuals who are hired to carry out investigations on behalf of individuals or organizations. In Ireland, the use of private investigators is governed by a range of laws and regulations. In this blog post, we will explore the use of...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...

Runaway jury

Runaway jury

The proposed abolition of the legal right to trial by jury in High Court defamation proceedings strikes not just at an ancient legal right, but also at the concept of the participation of the public in the administration of justice, argues Mr Justice Bernard Barton.

Don`t copy text!