Man (83) Awarded €15k After Injuring Neck In Shopping Centre Accident

head injury

12 October 2018

An 83-year-old man, who was injured in a fall when his shopping trolley jammed on a travelator, has been awarded €15,000 damages.

Judge Sarah Berkeley heard in the Circuit Civil Court that John Ansell had fallen backwards, injuring his neck and shoulder and cutting his left hand when he was on the travelator or moving walkway in the Showgrounds Shopping Centre in Clonmel, Co Tipperary.

Mr Ansell, of Listrolin, Mullinavat, Co Kilkenny, said he had taken a trolley from the Iceland Store in the centre and had gone shopping in several areas.

After finishing and paying for his goods, he had taken the travelator to the second-level car park.

Just as he was about to exit the top of the walkway, his trolley had jammed and he had been unable to free it although the walkway kept moving.

When it released, with the help of other shoppers, it had skewed sideways knocking him backwards and injuring him.

Mr Ansell sued two receivers over the assets of MK 1 Property Investments which included the Showgrounds Shopping Centre; the Showgrounds Management Company; Savills Commercial, which was the centre’s management agent; Iceland Stores (Ireland) and Ennis Lifts, now owned by Kone, all with addresses in Dublin where the trial was heard.

Judge Berkeley heard evidence from four experts whose evidence sought to cast blame both on the state of the travellator and the Iceland trolley used by Mr Ansell.

The judge told barrister Robert Fitzpatrick, who appeared with Pearse Mehigan Solicitors for Mr Ansell, that his client had not had any difficulty with the trolley until leaving the travelator and was completely blameless for the accident.


She accepted the evidence of Mr Ansell’s wife, Karen, that the shopping centre manager had told her about a similar accident involving an elderly lady on the travelator only a week previous to her husband’s fall.

Judge Berkeley criticised the shopping centre’s failure to investigate the earlier accident and said the centre had a poor system of recording and investigating incidents.

The judge said that Mr Ansell’s accident had been foreseeable.

Awarding Mr Ansell €15,000 damages jointly against the centre owners and Iceland, after accepting the pensioner had fairly disclosed a pre-existing condition with his neck and shoulder, the judge said Ennis Lifts did not have any liability.

Noting that Ennis Lifts had fully complied with its obligations under a maintenance contract, the judge dismissed the claim against them.

Paul O’Neill, who appeared with Shaffrey Solicitors for Ennis Lifts, successfully applied for the company’s costs against the other defendants.

Have you suffered from a similar injury?

Many thousands of people are injured each year — some very seriously — when they slip or trip and fall on a dangerous floor, a flight of stairs, or a rough patch of ground. Sometimes the owner of the property where the accident occurred is responsible for the accident, sometimes not.

If you have been injured in this way, first consider that it is a normal part of living for things to fall on or to drip onto a floor or the ground, and for smooth surfaces to become uneven.

We have provided a guideline blog post providing general rules to help you decide whether someone else was at fault for your slip or trip and fall injury, and whether you may have a case to seek case to seek compensation.

News Source: Irish Independant

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Judges should avoid ‘parental alienation’ term, report suggests

Parental alienation is a “highly controversial” concept and the use of the term in Irish legal settings should be treated with serious caution, researchers have said. Though the term is being used increasingly often by Irish judges, they “do not appear to use an...

Runaway jury

The proposed abolition of the legal right to trial by jury in High Court defamation proceedings strikes not just at an ancient legal right, but also at the concept of the participation of the public in the administration of justice, argues Mr Justice Bernard Barton.

Opinion: “No Collision, No Claim” The wrong decision?

Did the judge get it wrong in the recent case of a woman whose personal injury claim was dismissed due to lack of a collision? In my humble opinion, I would venture to say yes. The plaintiff in question alleged that she sustained injuries when she was compelled to...

Recent Articles

Solicitor’s Fees in Ireland

Understanding the various ways solicitors charge their clients in claims cases in Ireland, including hourly rates, fixed fees, and conditional fees (with restrictions), is important for those seeking legal representation, and utilising the Irish Claims Authority is an alternative to consider.

Alternatives to litigation in Ireland

Overview of alternatives to litigation Reference to arbitration is commonplace in commercial contracts. However, there is an increasing trend towards consent-based forms of ADR such as mediation and expert determination as more flexible and cost-efficient ADR...

Private Investigator use in Ireland

Private investigators are individuals who are hired to carry out investigations on behalf of individuals or organizations. In Ireland, the use of private investigators is governed by a range of laws and regulations. In this blog post, we will explore the use of...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...

Runaway jury

Runaway jury

The proposed abolition of the legal right to trial by jury in High Court defamation proceedings strikes not just at an ancient legal right, but also at the concept of the participation of the public in the administration of justice, argues Mr Justice Bernard Barton.

Don`t copy text!