Motorcyclist injured when he hit crowd-control barrier sues council and festival in High Court

A motorcyclist who was injured when he came off his bike after hitting a crowd-control barrier allegedly left on a roadway for a community festival is suing the local council, the festival managers, and local organisers in the High Court.

Des Kearns (57), of Wooddale Road, Rush, Co Dublin, is suing Fingal County Council, event managers ALA Markets and Events Ltd, of Glasnevin, Dublin, and by order of the court, CFTB Rush Harbour Festival, the locally based volunteer organisers of the event.

The defendants deny negligence and argue contributory negligence on the part of Mr Kearns for travelling too fast and failing to keep a proper lookout.

Mr Kearns, who had been a baggage handler at Dublin Airport at the time of the accident, says he fractured his elbow when he came off his motorbike after hitting the three foot high barrier at around 5am on July 31, 2016, as he was on his way to work.

He claims the barrier had been left at an oblique angle at the mouth of Kilbush Lane in Rush town where the Harbour Festival was on for the bank holiday weekend.

four courts, dublin

His counsel, Declan Doyle SC, instructed by Stuart Gilhooly, told the court as a result of the accident his client suffered serious and traumatic physical and psychological injury.

He eventually had to give up his job as a baggage handler because it was physically too difficult, counsel said. He had not gone back on the motorbike as a result of the psychological effect and physical difficulty in using the clutch on the bike.

He was also an enthusiastic amateur guitar player who now found it difficult to play any more as a result of his injury.

Mr Kearns, who is married with a teenage daughter, told the court the barrier on the road was at an angle as he came around a bend on the road. He clipped it as he tried to avoid it and this threw him off the bike, a 600cc Kawasaki.

He said was doing about 35kph and he believed it was the legs of the barrier he hit but it happened so quickly it was hard to know.

He was taken by ambulance to Beaumont Hospital where his fractured elbow was plastered and told to return a few days later where surgery was carried out on his elbow.

He said as a result of the accident he continued to suffer pain in his arm, found it hard to sleep and felt low and anxious. Eventually, he had to go see a counsellor to deal with the psychological effects and was very anxious and nervous.

He was out of work for 11 months and when he returned to work the job had changed and he was required to do very physical heavy baggage handling and it was very stressful. He found he could not handle it any more and was told by his new boss in his employers, Swissport, that he could not be treated any differently from others.

He got a new job with Aer Lingus in airplane catering which he kept up until the pandemic hit and, as his year long contract had run out, he was let go in early 2020. When the job was available again he had to turn it down because he felt he could not do it.

Under cross-examination by Micheál Ó’Scanaill SC, for the council, he denied he was either not keeping a proper lookout or travelling too fast. He disagreed the barrier was clearly visible.

Cross-examined by David Nolan SC, for the Rush Harbour Festival defendant, he disagreed he was going at “one hell of a speed” and “hit it at some whack” given the damage to the barrier shown in a photograph provided to the court.

“I can guarantee you I was not speeding, you are trying to suggest I was speeding and I was not”, he told counsel.

Mr Nolan said his side would give evidence that all the barriers hired for the festival had been collected and returned.

The case continues before Ms Justice Mary Rose Gearty.

If you would like an assessment of a claim, you can use the online form available here without obligation or alternatively you can use the automatic claim calculator.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Judges should avoid ‘parental alienation’ term, report suggests

Parental alienation is a “highly controversial” concept and the use of the term in Irish legal settings should be treated with serious caution, researchers have said. Though the term is being used increasingly often by Irish judges, they “do not appear to use an...

Runaway jury

The proposed abolition of the legal right to trial by jury in High Court defamation proceedings strikes not just at an ancient legal right, but also at the concept of the participation of the public in the administration of justice, argues Mr Justice Bernard Barton.

Opinion: “No Collision, No Claim” The wrong decision?

Did the judge get it wrong in the recent case of a woman whose personal injury claim was dismissed due to lack of a collision? In my humble opinion, I would venture to say yes. The plaintiff in question alleged that she sustained injuries when she was compelled to...

Recent Articles

Solicitor’s Fees in Ireland

Understanding the various ways solicitors charge their clients in claims cases in Ireland, including hourly rates, fixed fees, and conditional fees (with restrictions), is important for those seeking legal representation, and utilising the Irish Claims Authority is an alternative to consider.

Alternatives to litigation in Ireland

Overview of alternatives to litigation Reference to arbitration is commonplace in commercial contracts. However, there is an increasing trend towards consent-based forms of ADR such as mediation and expert determination as more flexible and cost-efficient ADR...

Private Investigator use in Ireland

Private investigators are individuals who are hired to carry out investigations on behalf of individuals or organizations. In Ireland, the use of private investigators is governed by a range of laws and regulations. In this blog post, we will explore the use of...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...

Runaway jury

Runaway jury

The proposed abolition of the legal right to trial by jury in High Court defamation proceedings strikes not just at an ancient legal right, but also at the concept of the participation of the public in the administration of justice, argues Mr Justice Bernard Barton.

Don`t copy text!