Four executives at Custom House Capital due in court over conspiracy to defraud investors

4 March 2023

Four senior executives of Custom House Capital have been directed to appear before Dublin Circuit Criminal Court next week in relation to a conspiracy to defraud investors in the firm over a decade ago.

Between last October and January, the company’s former CEO Harry Cassidy (67) and three other executives entered pleas of guilty to charges linked to the investment fraud. The pleas could not be reported on until now due to the ongoing trial of co-accused Ciara Kelleher, the firm’s senior portfolio relationship manager.

A jury failed to reach a verdict in Ms Kelleher’s trial at Dublin Circuit Criminal Court.

Cassidy (67), John Whyte (53), the company’s former head of private clients, and Paul Lavery (47), head of finance, pleaded guilty to conspiring with others to defraud investors in and clients and customers or Custom House Capital Ltd by intentionally misleading them as to where and/or how their assets had been placed contrary to common law.

Cassidy of Clon Brugh, Aitkens Village, Stepaside, entered his plea before a sitting of Dublin Circuit Criminal Court on January 17th, 2023.

Whyte of Beechpark, Lucan, Co Dublin pleaded guilty on November 7th, 2022 and Lavery of Rafeenan, Ballynod, Co Monaghan pleaded guilty on January 13th, 2023 respectively.

John Mulholland (73) of The Foxes Colvert, Mount Juliet estate, Thomastown, Co Kilkenny a non-executive director of CHC, pleaded guilty on October 17th, 2022 to one count of neglectful discharge of the duty of a directior in relation to the commission by the company of acts of dishonesty by inducing clients to entrust funds, refrain from removing funds with the intention of making a gain for itself and causing loss to another.

All of the offences occurred within the State on dates between October 1st, 2008 and July 15th, 2011.

Judge Orla Crowe adjourned the case and directed that the four defendants should appear in court on the next date, March 8th.

Follow us for the latest updates & news

Recent News

Judges should avoid ‘parental alienation’ term, report suggests

Parental alienation is a “highly controversial” concept and the use of the term in Irish legal settings should be treated with serious caution, researchers have said. Though the term is being used increasingly often by Irish judges, they “do not appear to use an...

Runaway jury

The proposed abolition of the legal right to trial by jury in High Court defamation proceedings strikes not just at an ancient legal right, but also at the concept of the participation of the public in the administration of justice, argues Mr Justice Bernard Barton.

Opinion: “No Collision, No Claim” The wrong decision?

Did the judge get it wrong in the recent case of a woman whose personal injury claim was dismissed due to lack of a collision? In my humble opinion, I would venture to say yes. The plaintiff in question alleged that she sustained injuries when she was compelled to...

Recent Articles

Solicitor’s Fees in Ireland

Understanding the various ways solicitors charge their clients in claims cases in Ireland, including hourly rates, fixed fees, and conditional fees (with restrictions), is important for those seeking legal representation, and utilising the Irish Claims Authority is an alternative to consider.

Alternatives to litigation in Ireland

Overview of alternatives to litigation Reference to arbitration is commonplace in commercial contracts. However, there is an increasing trend towards consent-based forms of ADR such as mediation and expert determination as more flexible and cost-efficient ADR...

Private Investigator use in Ireland

Private investigators are individuals who are hired to carry out investigations on behalf of individuals or organizations. In Ireland, the use of private investigators is governed by a range of laws and regulations. In this blog post, we will explore the use of...

Join our Panel

You May Also Like...

Runaway jury

Runaway jury

The proposed abolition of the legal right to trial by jury in High Court defamation proceedings strikes not just at an ancient legal right, but also at the concept of the participation of the public in the administration of justice, argues Mr Justice Bernard Barton.

Don`t copy text!